Answer:
a. $80,318.70
b. $97,568.57
Explanation:
Here is the full question :
You have just received a windfall from an investment you made in a friend's business. She will be paying you $ 15 comma 555 at the end of this year, $ 31 comma 110 at the end of next year, and $ 46 comma 665 at the end of the year after that (three years from today). The interest rate is 6.7 % per year. a. What is the present value of your windfall? b. What is the future value of your windfall in three years (on the date of the last payment)?
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows
Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator
Cash flow in year 1 = $ 15,555
Cash flow in year 2 = $31,110
Cash flow in year 3 = $ 46,665
I = 6.7%
Present value = $80,318.70
The formula for calculating future value:
FV = P (1 + r)^n
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
N = number of years
$80,318.70(1.067)^3 = $97,568.57
Answer:
1.78%
Explanation:
The computation of the annual interest rate earn is shown below:
= Every year payment ÷ Present value × 100
= $800 ÷ $45,000 × 100
= 1.78%
We simply divide the every year payment by the present value so that the correct annual interest rate can come
So, we consider all the information which is given in the question
Answer:
Cash 2,157 debit
bank service expense 85 debit
account receivables 2,242 credit
Explanation:
To record the bank memorand:
The collection in behalf of the firm will increase cash
The new print the checks will be considered either miscellaneuos expense or bank service expense either way, will decrease cash.
Net cash variation: 2,242 - 85 = 2,157
For the Company errors another entry will be made looking for errors between our numebrs and the bank.
Answer:tortious interference
Explanation:
tortious interference is a law term that comes to mind when there is a breach of contract resulting from the competitor's actions. Tortious interference in Tort law(an area of law) deals with the situation in which there is damage to property emanating from intentional or negligent acts of the defendant, in this case the competitor in business. In which case the actions(competitive behaviour) of defendant is not justifiable and permissible and simultaneously breaches contract of plaintiff, it becomes tortious interference.