Answer:
b.moral hazard
Explanation:
If a person borrow from bank to buy car but actually he borrow to pay lottery. in this case the person will face Moral Hazards.
A=<span>is an expression of the ease with which alternating current flows through a complex circuit or system.
B=</span><span>Student–teacher ratio or student–faculty ratio is the number of students who attend a school or university divided by the number of teachers in the institution
so the answer will be B
hope this helps.
</span>
Answer:
B) the same amount of capital and labor
Explanation:
Only an increase in productivity shifts the production function upward given that all factors of production remain the same. Generally technology improves productivity and causes those shifts.
Productivity measures the rate of output per unit of input. E.g. I write 10 pages per hour. If my writing productivity increases, I will write 12 pages per hour. Labor productivity is measured by the amount of output produced per hour worked.
There are different kinds of cases. The answers to the questions are blow.
- Before any court can hear any dispute between Miriam and the trucking company, it must have the jurisdiction to do so.
- In order for Marya to sue the trucking firm, she has to file the lawsuit in a court that also has personal jurisdiction over the <u>Defendant</u>.
- Georgia and Florida have personal jurisdiction over the trucking firm?
Yes, Marya sue the trucking firm in Georgia and Florida state courts.
Miriam would likely NOT want to sue the trucking firm in Georgia because she would need to;
- Get a lawyer in Georgia
- Make multiple trips to Georgia
- Have witnesses travel to Georgia.
Miriam would likely want to sue the trucking firm in Florida because:
1. The court is closer to her home
2. She can better research for local lawyers
- Miriam can sue the trucking firm in a federal trial court because residents of different states.
<h3>What takes place in a court case?</h3>
In a trial done in a court, lawyers often present evidence via witnesses who are known to testify about what they have seen or known.
After all the evidence had been presented, the lawyers will then give their closing arguments and lastly, the jury then decides if the defendant is guilty or not guilty.
Learn more about jurisdiction from
brainly.com/question/681072
Answer:
• A professional makes deliberate choices where others have choices made for them or they simply react to what comes their way.
° A professional is afforded the luxury of making deliberate choices because he has made deliberate preparations.
•A professional can make deliberate preparations because his understanding of and familiarity with the relevant (professional) landscape informs him on how to prepare. Also, like the chess master, he is trained to understand the inevitable results of hundreds of different patterns; he has disciplined himself to observe the whole board and not just the most immediate features or the area with the most tension in the game.
•A professional is seldom caught off-balance. The discipline for deliberate preparation and the understanding that comes with it allow that even when something unexpected or unfamiliar is introduced, a professional can quickly understand its basis and easily extrapolate the appropriate tactic, strategy, or process for ethically and successfully resolving issues.
•In this capacity, and most fundamentally, a professional habitually makes the right choices because all of his choices are based on the integrity provided by his moral and ethical foundation. Any choice of expedience over integrity can quite easily be recognized by anyone as the wrong choice. Here, the professional simply acknowledges what is obvious, makes the right choice, and acts deliberately (and now we're back at the start of this list).