The above prompt is a review of the literature on art titled "Art and Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking" by David Bayles and Ted Orland.
<h3>What are the answers related to the above prompt?</h3>
1) The two kinds of "ordinary problems" that an artist would be faced with once they have finished their artwork are:
- Creating Awareness of the finished work
- Getting to promote the philosophy behind it.
As reported in the text an author is quoted as saying that they could only create about seven days in a month for the process of creating the art. The other days were spent on gallery business and engaging the right audience.
2) The good part to competition as indicated by the author is that it can be harnessed to make one's work way better than the last. The bad side however is that competition can be vicious and self-destructive. He cited how it created depression for Milton, rage for W.C. fields etc. The fear was the inability to get the right recognition.
3) According to the author the two things, in earlier times, provided a "cultural niche" for art were:
4) The two basic frameworks for art education that the author discusses are:
- The University; and
- Everything else
The advantages and disadvantages of each are:
- University: You get to learn a whole lot of other ideas and subjects
- Everything else: You get to devote your time solely to art all the time.
According to the authors, the best kinds of books on art for working artists are those that describe not the finished piece but the process that created the work of art.
This is because these books emphasize the process over the finished product and as such are filled with a lot of insights.
Learn more about Art:
brainly.com/question/14253780
#SPJ1
Answer:
Turkles argument speaks to the superiority of face to face conversations over technology-aided or enabled communication such as emails and texting.
Turkle indeed alludes to the advantages given by the use of technology such as email and texting services etc to modify our conversation/message to perfection.
In her opinion, this is at best superficial in the long run and does not replace the good old fashion face to face (albeit "imperfect") mode of communication which allows for deeper connections that technology can ever allow.
She notes in paragraph 11 that Human relationships are worth a bundle, complicated and challenging. She indicates that humans have acquired the habit of using technology to make these interactions seem "flawless". According to Turkle, this shifting behaviour towards a perfect representation of self has only reduced conversation to electronic connections and that this has devalued the worth of human interactions which whose real benefit is in connecting with one another.
According to her, online connections don't present a substitute for real conversations.
