C. asks the benevolent social planner to step in and fix things
Answer:
1. Patricians
2. Plebeians
3. It was the first Roman law
4. Consuls
Explanation:
1. Patricians were known to be the wealthiest and most of them were aristocrats. They were allowed to be a part of the government. Also, their women also enjoyed some degree of freedom.
2. All other citizens in Rome were referred to as Plebeians. They were common people who were mainly landowners, shop keepers, and merchants. They couldn't hold the public office but they were allowed to vote.
3. The law of 12 tables was important because it was the first Roman law to help people identify legal and illegal activities.
4. Consuls had the highest level. Each year the citizens of Rome elected two consuls whose power was equally divided and served for one year.
Hypothesis is the correct answer.
A hypothesis is an idea or explanation created to explain a particular situation or condition. It's an unapproved theory that is given based on very limited evidence. Thus, when Mr. and Mrs. Hill say that their kids should pursue certain careers based on the assumption that men are good at Math and women are good at writing, their message best reflects what we know as a hypothesis.
As a single mother in young adulthood living in a developed country it is less likely that I’ll be exercising on a regular basis. The reasons could be multiple ranging from a busy lifestyle to maintaining balance between personal and professional life.
Many estimates have shown that young adults usually suffer from several issues like the burden of responsibilities, juggling for a better lifestyle, searching for jobs and stress. Researches have shown that children who exercise daily are more likely to continue this routine in the later stages of their life.
Motherhood comes with varied responsibilities and in most of the cases, single mothers find it difficult to maintain balance between work and household chores. Thus, it is more likely for them to skip exercise or workout.
To learn more about lifestyle here
brainly.com/question/20869690
#SPJ4
Either way people would be upset. If you cut programs, those who benefited from them would be mad, whereas an increase in taxes will also upset everyone, because no one really likes taxes.
