The answer is to your question is unbalanced
The correct statement is that driving slower in the left lane is a violation of traffic law, as the laws don't permit to drive slower in the left lane. Slower driving can be exercised in the right lane.
The drivers cannot follow the practice of driving slower than the surrounding speed of other cars, as it makes the road dangerous and is punishable with appropriate fines and penalties.
<h3>Traffic Rules. </h3>
- As the drivers in the right lane are allowed to drive at a speed irregular of the other speeds of left lanes, they are required to change their pace at different times.
Hence, the drivers driving at slower speed in the left lane is considered to violate the traffic laws.
Learn more about traffic rules here:
brainly.com/question/7634466
Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.
Answer:
The phrase 'Break the Law' means to fail to obey a law; to act contrary to a law. Derived from combining the words 'Hack' and 'Activism', hacktivism is the act of hacking, or breaking into a computer system, for politically or socially motivated purposes. The individual who performs an act of hacktivism is said to be a hacktivist. Which in all words saying should not be given a reward for breaking into something unless given the consent of the owners the owners may hire or ask them to help find a fault in there system but in other terms this should not happen.
Answer:
TLO, what amendment did this case involve? ... How did the court distinguish between the Tinker case and the Fraser case? the court distinguished it by saying the speech was unrelated to any political viewpoint. In Miranda v.
