For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act.
Option e
<u>Explanation:</u>
An entity that exists only through its employees and their functions is called as an corporation. Although, a corporation may be held liable for various criminal activities, for example: the employee did that criminal act in the scope of employment, the failure in performing an affirmative duty.
Corporations must perform certain responsibilities and duties to which they are bound to, if unable to perform those duties, it may result in criminal liability. However, a criminally liable company's prosecutor does not have to prove that the "employee was trying to receive some benefit from the criminal act".
Answer:
Its a series of airline hijackings and attacks committed in 2001 by 19 militants associated with the Islamic extremist group AL-Qaeda against targets in the United States, the deadliest terrorist attacks on American soil in U.S. history.
Explanation:
Expectancy Theory
In this theory, individuals' expectations that substance use lowers sexual inhibitions and/or enhances sexual pleasure moderates its relationship to sexual behavior, making sexual behavior under the influence more likely and more risky as such expectations increase.
The penalty for a crime against humanity is imprisonment for a term not exceeding 30 years.
Answer:
Explanation:
Utterly true.
I once asked my wife to teach me to draw an Erlenmeyer flask. She showed me, and she's a good teacher. Then she said "Draw 50 of these. By the time you've done that, you should see how the lines work." She was wrong. My first flask was no worse nor better than the 50th one and I never did see how the lines worked.
I can do math, but my drawings look like I never graduated from Grade 1.
