Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Draw your figures the same way as I did, and see if you understand the explanations before writing them down. It's most important to learn from your work :)
Answer:
a) 3.128
b) Yes, it is an outerlier
Step-by-step explanation:
The standardized z-score for a particular sample can be determined via the following expression:
z_i = {x_i -\bar x}/{s}
Where;
\bar x = sample means
s = sample standard deviation
Given data:
the mean shipment thickness (\bar x) = 0.2731 mm
With the standardized deviation (s) = 0.000959 mm
The standardized z-score for a certain shipment with a diameter x_i= 0.2761 mm can be determined via the following previous expression
z_i = {x_i -\bar x}/{s}
z_i = {0.2761-0.2731}/{ 0.000959}
z_i = 3.128
b)
From the standardized z-score
If [z_i < 2]; it typically implies that the data is unusual
If [z_i > 2]; it means that the data value is an outerlier
However, since our z_i > 3 (I.e it is 3.128), we conclude that it is an outerlier.
Answer:
I believe it should be b and d
Step-by-step explanation:
hoped it helped :)
Answer: f(x) = x/2 + 4.
where f(x) is the number of stamps that Tom has, and x is the number of stamps that Myrna has.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is:
"Tom has four more than half the stamps that Myrna has"
For how is written, we can model the number of stamps that Tom has as a function f(x).
f(x) represents the number of stamps that Tom has, and x is the number of stamps that Myrna has.
Then:
"four more than a number" is written as:
N + 4 (where N is the number)
"Half the stamps that Myrna has" is written as:
x/2.
Then the whole statement can be modeled as:
f(x) = x/2 + 4.
notice that we have x/2, and f(x) must be a whole number, so Myrna must have an even number of stamps (in that case x/2 will be integer)
