The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
A persuasive speech on a question of fact is essentially the same as an informative speech. False. A persuasive speech and an informative speech are still two completely different types of speeches. A persuasive speech is when you are trying to change the viewpoint of someone else to reflect one similar to yours or facts. An informative speech is solely presenting the information to someone else.
Answer:
The correct answer is <em>‘parens patriae’</em>
Explanation:
<u>‘Parens patriae’</u>, which literally means ‘the parent of the country’ <em>refers to the idea that the state is guardian or a protector of individuals that have limited legal capacity</em>, for example, children. In this way, the state should act in the best interest of a child.
In England, the <u>court of chancery</u> first introduced this idea to the legal system. Such courts took care of cases that involved juvenile offenders. Back then monarch was considered the parent of the country, while in modern days the state itself.
