Signing treaties would be an executive power which is authorized by the Constitution
Solve for: <span>xy</span>Let's solve for x.<span><span>x+<span>5y</span></span>=8</span>Step 1: Add -5y to both sides.<span><span><span>x+<span>5y</span></span>+<span>−<span>5y</span></span></span>=<span>8+<span>−<span>5y</span></span></span></span><span>x=<span><span>−<span>5y</span></span>+8</span></span>Answer:x=<span><span>−<span>5y</span></span>+<span>8</span></span>1.
2.
Let's solve for x.<span><span><span>2x</span>+<span>3y</span></span>=9</span>Step 1: Add -3y to both sides.<span><span><span><span>2x</span>+<span>3y</span></span>+<span>−<span>3y</span></span></span>=<span>9+<span>−<span>3y</span></span></span></span><span><span>2x</span>=<span><span>−<span>3y</span></span>+9</span></span>Step 2: Divide both sides by 2.<span><span><span>2x</span>2</span>=<span><span><span>−<span>3y</span></span>+9</span>2</span></span><span>x=<span><span><span><span>−3</span>2</span>y</span>+<span>92</span></span></span>Answer:<span>x=<span><span><span><span>−3</span>2</span>y</span>+<span>9<span>2</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
Local and community are the two houses of the bicameral council.
Explanation:
Bicameralism means there will be prevalence of two houses or councils. In United States, the legislature composes of two houses.
House of Representatives consists of people who represent the population size of the state. This house maintains a close link with the local constituency. Senate has two statesmen who are representing each state irrespective of the populace size.
Bicameralism is the best form in order to have supervisory and regulatory authority between the houses and no branch becomes autocratic.
Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
Answer:
What is the questionФω∫
Explanation:
What is the question exactly?