1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lyudmila [28]
3 years ago
10

Compared to middle-age workers today, the cohorts who have retired since the 1970s had higher social security benefits. were les

s likely to have pension plans. had wives in the work force. had more elderly parents needing care.
Social Studies
1 answer:
7nadin3 [17]3 years ago
5 0
<span><span>The correct answer is "they were less likely to have pension plans", in the current time, most people have pension plans, because they plan their retirement almost when they start working.</span> <span>In addition, most companies have pension plans as a benefit for their employees and it is very accessible to acquire a private pension plan.</span></span>
You might be interested in
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
Study the table below.
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

Buddhism i m not sure but maybe buddhism

6 0
3 years ago
What viewpoint do Jim and the slaveowner first have about the turtle in The People Could Fly?
Lyrx [107]

Answer:

I think the answer is D, bcuz i took the quix on edge.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How old was tara lipinski when she won the gold medal
dem82 [27]

Answer:

15

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which group was the fastest growing population in Indian Territory by 1900?
sashaice [31]

whites where the fastest growing population



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What makes a natural resource so valuable?
    13·1 answer
  • Bobby's teacher administered an informal reading inventory and found that he had a fourth grade instructional reading level and
    12·1 answer
  • Hanna is having her first child. she has done the reading on childbirth and knows that she will have completed the first stage o
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a difference between authoritarian government and constitutional government?
    10·2 answers
  • A(n) ________ is the evaluation of or feelings toward a person, idea, or object that are typically positive or negative.
    15·1 answer
  • What do you think is the most important influence on a person's personality and social behavior?
    15·1 answer
  • Impeachment power is a check Congress has over __________.
    8·2 answers
  • Tom is a non-union employee at General Power. Eight-five percent of the employees at General Power are unionized. The union at G
    11·2 answers
  • When people ask Sandra why she smokes, she tells them that it's just too difficult to stop. This suggests that Sandra
    11·1 answer
  • 2. Which of these is an example of a service?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!