1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Trava [24]
1 year ago
14

What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Advocard [28]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

You might be interested in
Why do you think historians refer to the area as mesomerica
Natasha2012 [34]

An anthropologist named Paul Kirchkoff first used the term “Mesoamerica” (meso is Greek for “middle” or “intermediate”) in 1943 to designate these geographical areas as having shared cultural traits prior to the invasion of Europeans, and the term has remained.

3 0
2 years ago
Chapter 12 notes that researchers such as Kahneman and Tversky are pessimistic about our decision-making skills, whereas researc
adell [148]

Answer:

"the pessimists underestimate our decision-making accuracy because of factors such as choosing questions that contradict people's schemas"

Explanation:

Thaler is together with Daniel Khaneman one of the parents of behavioral economics. This branch focuses on explaining and even looking for meaning in our economic behavior. In other words, why we make the decisions we make regarding our money.

In many social sciences, two different points of view about our rationality coexist today: the pessimist, who sees our limitations as systematic errors at the root of our possible irrational behavior; and the optimist, who conceives these limits as ecological advantages. The first point of view, the pessimist, is maintained by Tversky and Kahneman in their research program on heuristics and biases, and is also based on the theory of "little shoves" or nudges, which Thaler and Sunstein propose following that approach of Tversky and Kahneman.

The second, the optimist, has been developed by Gerd Gigerenzer and the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, and by other evolutionary psychologists such as Leda Cosmides and John Tooby.

4 0
3 years ago
Que es la constituson​
vazorg [7]
Un cuerpo de principios fundamentales o precedentes establecidos según los cuales se reconoce que un Estado u otra organización se gobierna.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Como nació la bandera argentina?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

La creación de la bandera de la Argentina es generalmente atribuida a Manuel Belgrano, quien hizo una bandera a principios de 1812 usando los colores blanco y celeste conforme a los de la escarapela ya oficializada.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is the best summary of the research on a possible connection between the consumption of violent media and real-world violen
ASHA 777 [7]

Violence in the actual world and violence in the media are not universally accepted as being related.

What is violent media ?

Almost from the beginning of television, parents, educators, lawmakers, and mental health specialists have sought to comprehend the effects of the medium, particularly on children. The representation of violence has drawn particular attention, especially in light of psychologist Albert Bandura's research on social learning and children's propensity to emulate what they see in the 1970s.

The Surgeon General's Scientific Advisory Committee on Television and Social Conduct was established in 1969 to examine the effects of violence on viewers' attitudes, values, and behavior as a result of 15 years of "consistently alarming" results about the violent content of children's shows. The ensuing report and a follow-up report from the National Institute of Mental Health in 1982.

Learn more about violent media with the help of given link:-

brainly.com/question/2038726

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Immediately after world war 2, which country exerted political and economic control over Poland, Hungary, and Romania?
    11·1 answer
  • Why have gifted and talented programs met with resistance from many Americans? Group of answer choices A) ​The programs have not
    8·1 answer
  • List two benefits of reforestation to the environment
    7·1 answer
  • A 69 year-old man received Td vaccination 4 years ago. He is preparing to travel to see his newborn granddaughter next month. Wh
    15·1 answer
  • Identifying: What was the source of the conflict between the United States and Mexico before they went to war?
    5·1 answer
  • ________ function as agents of socialization by contributing to our sense of "belonging" and our feelings of self-worth. They pr
    8·1 answer
  • How does the letter from Boston Evening Transcript show that racism existed in the North?
    13·1 answer
  • 5. What is one main reason that rainforests are being destroyed?
    8·1 answer
  • Para que se utiliza una bitacora
    5·1 answer
  • The monoamine hypothesis of depression proposes that:.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!