1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
4 years ago
9

How much force is required to accelerate a car with a mass 2000 kg to 3m/s^2?

Physics
2 answers:
asambeis [7]4 years ago
5 0
The answer is C. 6000N



Cloud [144]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Option a) 6000 kg.m/s

Explanation:

mass = 2000 kg

acceleration = 3m/s^2

force = mass × acceleration

= 2000 × 3

= <em>6000 kg.m/s</em>

<em>Hope this helps</em>

<em>plz mark as brainliest!!!!!</em>

You might be interested in
I need help with homework! what should i choose as the greatest british invention?
STatiana [176]
THE MINI Alec Issigonis, 1959
The Telephone Alexander Graham Bell, 1876

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2013-01-08/the-50-greatest-british-inventions



4 0
4 years ago
Which statement about temperature is correct?
maria [59]

B.temperature is an indirect measurement of the heat energy in a substance

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A very hard rubber ball (m = 0.5 kg) is falling vertically at 4 m/s just before it bounces on the floor. The ball rebounds back
saw5 [17]

Answer:

The force exerted by the floor is 80 N.

Explanation:

Given that,

Mass of ball = 0.5 kg

Velocity= 4 m/s

Time t = 0.05 s

When the ball rebounds then the kinetic energy is

K.E =\dfrac{1}{2}mv^2

Where, m = mass of ball

v = velocity of ball

Put the value into the formula

K.E=\dfrac{1}{2}\times0.5\times(4)^2

K.E = 4\ J

The average force exerted by the floor on the ball = change in kinetic energy over collision time

F = \dfrac{4}{0.05}

F=80\ N

Hence, The force exerted by the floor is 80 N.

4 0
3 years ago
Answer the amplitude part of the questions in 7, 8, &amp; 9
erastova [34]
I actually believe for the first question, it would be complete destructive interference as the amplitude and the approximate wavelength for each are the same and will completely or entirely cancel out, rather than simply decreasing or lowering the amplitude as in the bottom question.

The amplitude for the first will be 0, as the 2 waves will cancel each other out. The amplitude of the second, will be 3x, I believe, assuming the amplitude of the first is 2x and the second is 1x, in a constructive interference, I believe the amplitudes would add up.

Likewise for the bottom, I believe you would be subtracting the supposed amplitude of the first which is 2x from 1x which would be 1x.
5 0
4 years ago
Which part is not necessary to complete a circuit
Levart [38]
A SWITCH I THINK??..

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A car accelerates uniformly from rest to a speed of 40.0 mi/h in 12.0 s. find (a) the distance the car travels during this time
    10·2 answers
  • A cat dozes on a stationary merry-go-round, at a radius of 5.7 m from the center of the ride. Then the operator turns on the rid
    11·1 answer
  • How are some types of collisions different from others?
    10·1 answer
  • The strength of an electromagnet can be altered by
    5·2 answers
  • An archer wishes to shoot an arrow at a target at eye level a distance of 50.0m away. If the initial speed imparted to the arrow
    13·1 answer
  • A series of optical telescopes produced an image that has a resolution of about 0.00350 arc second.
    11·1 answer
  • 5. For the speaker in this circuit, the voltage across it is always proportional to the current through it. Find the maximum amo
    13·1 answer
  • Fast food meals are typically high in all except 1 fat 2 calories 3 sodium 4 fiber
    13·1 answer
  • 14. When incoming light rays strike a flat, plane mirror at an
    14·1 answer
  • Use the following formula to answer the following statement. Round to the nearest tenth.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!