Answer:
D
Explanation:
Geothermal energy utilizes the natural heat of underneath rocks to heat water to steam. The steam is then used to turn turbines and generate electricity. The water is usually recycled by being injected back to the ground to make sustainable use of the water. However, this process of injecting water in the ground may contaminate the groundwater in aquifers. The water can, therefore, be unsuitable for human use such as watering of plants and animals including household use.
Often on television shows and in articles I see it mentioned that it'd always be bad to blow up an asteroid or comet because then the energy would just be spread out and cause even more damage.
According to some estimates I've seen around 100 tons (or more) of meteoroids hit the Earth each day. If all of this were combined together into a single asteroid, it could destroy an entire, large city.
Given that alone, it makes it seem to me that it be more logical to take the chance and blow up an asteroid and thereby trim its weight down, causing a lot more to be more easily burnt up on entry, so that when it did hit, it would cause less damage.
Is this logical at all? If my science/math/physics is incorrect, I want to understand why having more burn up by spreading out is worse compared to having it more concentrated and vastly more dangerous.
<span>50%
Since each parent contributes 1 allele to their offspring, we can expect a even distribution of 4 allele combinations in the offspring of these fish. They are
s1s2 = s1 from 1st parent, s2 from 2nd parent
s1s4 = s1 from 1st parent, s4 from 2nd parent
s3s2 = s3 from 1st parent, s2 from 2nd parent
s3s4 = s3 from 1st parent, s4 from 2nd parent
Since both the s1s4 and s3s2 offspring have 5 units of color, that would indicate that 50% of their offspring will have 5 units of color.</span>
Because they have been living longer