I think that the answer to this question should be based upon your opinion sorry if you were expecting the actual answer
Answer:
Answer is given below.
Explanation:
-Income from Continuing Operation 700000
-Discontinued Operations
-Loss from operations of 60000
discontinued segment (75000*80%)
-Gain on disposal of discontinued 168000 108000
segment (210000*80%)
-Net Income 808000
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
I think your answer should be c. Hope this helps. :)