1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sav [38]
3 years ago
14

Compare a stock insurer to a mutual insurer with respect to each of the following: a. Parties who legally own the company b. Rig

ht to assess policyholders additional premiums c. Right of policyholders to elect the board of directors
Business
1 answer:
NemiM [27]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

a. Parties who legally own the company

The kind of corporation that is owned by the shareholders is a stock insurer. While when policy holders elect board of directors then that is call a mutual insurer. This board of director enjoys control over the management control of the corporation.

b. Right to assess policyholders additional premiums

An asses sable policy can not be issued by the stock insurers, however policy of such kind can be issued by the mutual insurer. For mutual insurer, this policy depends on what kind of insurer is in place.

c. Right of policyholders to elect the board of directors

For stock insurer, its is the stockholders who elect the board of directors. While for mutual insurer, its the owners who elect the board of directors who have an effective control over the management.

You might be interested in
MCDONALDS GIVE DIRECTIONS
Maslowich

Answer:

TAKE A LEFT

Explanation:

ON 123 SESAME STREET

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"a promise to your mother to refrain from going to bed later than 11:00 p.m. on a school night is what type of consideration?"
zimovet [89]
Statement: <span>"a promise to your mother to refrain from going to bed later than 11:00 p.m. on a school night

</span>The type of consideration: <span>A benefit to the promisor

Promisor is the person who makes a promise. A person promises to refrain to not got to the bed later than 11:00 pm at school night is for the long term benefit of the person who is making the and not who is asking for the promise.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Cecelia's government provides for her basic needs. In return, Cecelia works in the factory downtown, as she always has since the
amid [387]
The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:

<span>A. a market system
B. a planned system
C. a mixed system
D. none of the above

I think the correct answer is option B. </span>Cecelia's government can be considered a planned system. It <span>is an economic </span>system<span> in which inputs are based on direct allocation. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Trout farming is a perfectly competitive industry and all trout farms have the same cost curves.
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

(i) The farm can cover its revenue using its total variable cost, therefore the farm will continue producing 200 units

(ii)  The farm cannot cover its revenue using its total variable cost, therefore the farm will shut down

(iii)  The two relevant points on supply curve will be: (Price = $12 & Quantity = 0) and (Price = $25 & Quantity = 200)

Explanation:

(i)According to given data,  When output is 200 but price is $20, this price is equal to ATC, so the farm breaks even. But since this price is higher than AVC of $15, the farm can cover its revenue using its total variable cost, therefore the farm will continue producing 200 units.

(ii) When output is 200 but price is $12, this price is equal to ATC, so the farm makes economic loss. Also, this price is lower than AVC of $15, so the farm cannot cover its revenue using its total variable cost, therefore the farm will shut down.

(iii) The farm's supply curve is the portion of its Marginal cost (MC) curve above the minimum point of AVC. Since price equals MC, the two relevant points on supply curve will be: (Price = $12 & Quantity = 0) and (Price = $25 & Quantity = 200).

4 0
3 years ago
A debtor owed a creditor $1,200 on a promissory note that was due on August 1. After the debtor told the creditor that he might
Ilya [14]

Answer:

The correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as the options are omitted. The question is therefore completed before answering the question by providing the options as follows:

A. No, because the debtor incurred no additional detriment that would serve as consideration for the new agreement.

B. Yes, because it would have cost the creditor $1,200 to purchase the entertainment system himself.

C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

D. Yes, because the new agreement between the debtor and the creditor is enforceable with or without

Explanation of the answer is now provided as follows.

It is possible to enforce the two parties' new agreement as an accord.

An accord can be described as an agreement in which one party to an existing contract agrees to accept some other, different performance from the other party in lieu of the performance that the other party is obligated to provide. In principle, an agreement must be backed by payment, but the consideration can be less than the amount agreed upon in the preceding contract if it is of a different character or the claim is to be paid to a third party. The responsibility of the debtor to supply the creditor with a new entertainment system was enough fresh consideration to constitute a legal agreement in this case.

When a party's responsibility is modified in some way, as the debtor's duty was in this case, the preceding legal duty rule does not apply. It makes no difference whether the creditor's benefit in the accord arrangement is equal to the original debt's worth; courts will find appropriate consideration if the consideration is fresh or different in any way. The difference in the debtor's obligation, that is, payment is in the form of an entertainment system rather than cash) is enough to sustain the accord arrangement, regardless of how much the entertainment system would have cost the creditor.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not apply because the original agreement was not for the sale of goods. The underlying commitment in this case was to pay a debt secured by a promissory note.

Therefore, the correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which character is described in these lines? "the man-rular famous, the long worthy atheling, sighed for his liegemen
    8·2 answers
  • 2. You have been asked to identify the various segment in the market and then a potential targeting strategy. Describe the segme
    12·1 answer
  • Fazel Company makes and sells paper products. In the coming year, Fazel expects total sales of $19,730,000. There is a 3% commis
    13·1 answer
  • The current period statement of cash flows includes the flowing: Cash balance at the beginning of the period $310,000 Cash provi
    14·1 answer
  • The _____ section of a business plan should include ownership details.
    15·1 answer
  • he Steel Mill is currently operating at 84 percent of capacity. Annual sales are $28,400 and net income is $2,250. The firm has
    8·1 answer
  • Mary and Kay, Inc., a distributor of cosmetics throughout Florida, is in the process of assembling a cash budget for the first q
    12·1 answer
  • A system in which businesses operate under minimal government regulation
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose the GDP is in equilibrium at full employment and the MPC is .80. If government wants to increase its purchase of goods a
    7·1 answer
  • why might investors prefer stock dividends over cash dividends? a.) if they are seeking flexibility b.) if they are seeking a pr
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!