Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
The correct answer would be, Empathy Altruism model of prosocial behavior.
In order to want to help other people, you must first imagine yourself in their situation and feel their pain. This statement summarizes the Empathy Altruism Model of Prosocial Behavior.
Explanation:
An action by a person in which he intends to help others is called as the Prosocial Behavior.
The biggest motivation of this behavior is Altruism.
When a person wants something good for others selflessly, it is called as Altruism. The well being of others is highly concerned in altruism.
Empathy Altruism is a form of altruism. In this form, the person has feelings of concern for others. When someone is concerned about the feelings of others, he puts himself at the place of other and understands what he is thinking in this situation, then he tries to behave accordingly.
For example, if a person is furious on something, the person with empathy altruism will put himself at the place of that person and try to understand the reasons of the person's anger or being furious, and won't get upset after understand his situation.
Learn more about Empathy Altruism at:
brainly.com/question/6656094
#LearnWithBrainly
I think it would depend upon the financial background of a student. A good family financial support does not need a big amount for education. The US offers part time job opportunities that are favorable for them. The percentage should still look into a financial assessment for school education and have a definite clustered support that is based on their capacity to go through the whole course.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Based on the two articles you read, A person would have less privacy is <span>might google's mission to give everyone access to as much information as possible be controversial</span>
Answer:
The given question is incomplete; options are missing.
The missing options are:
A. valid because this conclusion is believable.
B. valid because this is indeed a valid syllogism and the logic is apparent.
C. invalid because this syllogism does not involve a pragmatic reasoning schema.
D. invalid because of the influence of the atmosphere effect.
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a rhetorical device used to draw a conclusion about certain arguments(premise). It is a form of logical reasoning.
A syllogism can be divided into three parts:
- Minor premise
- Major Premise
- Conclusion
In the given case, the major premise is <em>"some tired people are irritable" </em>because it is stating a fact;<em> "all of the students are tired"</em> is a minor premise that is specifying a statement, and <em>"some of the students are irritable"</em> is a conclusion drawn from the major and minor premise.
This syllogism will be considered valid because the conclusion is believable.
