Answer:
4x-7
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve for x:
180 = 44 + 3x - 11 + 4x - 7
Combine like terms: 180 = 26 + 7x
Simplify: 154 = 7x
Simplify: 22 = x
Substitute: 3(22) - 11 = 55 and 4(22) - 7 = 81
Create inequality: 44 < 55 < 81
Answer:
5.3
Step-by-step explanation:
Cos(68) = adjacent/hypotenuse
Cos(68) = 2/AC
AC = 2/cos(68)
AC = 5.3389343253
AC = 5.3
Fatima's claim is not supported by the table because, the distribution is skewed right, with a median of 0.4 field goal advantage.
From the table, the median position is calculated as:
The 0.2nd data falls in the 0.4 field goal category.
So, the median element is:
However, the distribution of the table are concentrated on the left.
This means that, the distribution is not uniform, instead it is skewed right.
A uniform distribution has a skewness of 0.
Hence, Fatima's claim is not supported by the table
Read more about distributions at:
brainly.com/question/13233983
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
7x2=14, 14+2=16, 16 is not 0.
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
