Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
A change to an original document, such as the constitution, is an amendment.
The answer would be B. corporate farming
While the nurse is transporting a client on a stretcher to the radiology department, the client begins having a tonic-colonic seizure. The action that should be taken by the nurse is to observe the time and record the details of the seizure and postictal state.
Recording the duration and specifics of the seizure is crucial since the description of the seizure is frequently used to determine the diagnosis and course of treatment for seizures.
Restraining the client during the seizure and inserting an oral airway are not advised. To reduce the danger of damage during the seizure, the nurse might need to relocate the patient.
To learn more about seizure click here:
brainly.com/question/14531798
#SPJ4
<span>is not a practical option</span>