1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helen [10]
3 years ago
13

You are having dinner with your friend Sophia when she experiences a sudden onset of intense terror, without warning and with no

specific cause. Sophia would most likely be diagnosed as suffering from _____.
A. obsessive-compulsive disorder
B. panic disorder
C. phobic disorder
D. generalized anxiety disorder
Social Studies
1 answer:
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. panic disorder

Explanation:

Panic disorder is a type of anxiety disorder that occurs when a person suffers from sudden, unexpected panic attacks, when the person feel intese threat, fear, or worry, accompanied by the corresponding physical symptons of agigation, palpitation, shortness of breath, urges to run, etc.

Sophia suffers from panic disorder because in a safe, non-challenging situation such as having dinner with a friend, she unexpectedly feels a threat, or a terror, as if she was in danger of something. These type of disorder is not generalized anixety disorder because in that case what would happen is that Sophia would be constantly anxious about going out, having dinner, holding a conversation, interacting with waiting staff, etc.

You might be interested in
The earliest fossilized human remains have been found in __________.
SashulF [63]

d asia.


Your welcome :3

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would a society be like if there were no rules enacted by a body like the legislature?​
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

Without any rules and regulation in society there would most likely be anarchy and even greater corruption by the few.

It would be total anarchy.

At first it would be fine. People would get along fine. But then someone gets drunk and kills someone else. Then a third person kills the second person.

Finally, a fourth person would try to stop the fight peacefully, he would die, and then everyone would get angry at the person who killed the fourth guy (I know, it’s confusing, but stay with me), and they would kill him.

People would then realise, after the fact no one got in trouble, that they could do whatever they wanted. Large companies wouldn't Have to abide by any laws, so monopolies would occur.

Because there is no government, there would be no official currency. This means coins would be counterfeited and the economy would crash.

There would be environmental damage as well. Without any laws about game, critically endangered animals would die out, causing the ecosystem to fall apart. Overfishing would kill of entire species of fish.

Finally, only small villages would remain, as cities would be to dangerous because of all the pillaging. Seaside towns would die out as overfishing would destroy their food source. small villages would have their own governments and would survive for a couple more decades until bandits came and looted everyone.

By this point, nuclear power plants will of melted, causing extreme damage to what's left of the ecosystem. Bandits would survive the longest, because they’re nomads they'd pillage until there truly was no food left, and then the human race would die.

Hope this helps and if you could mark me as brainliest. Thanks!

4 0
2 years ago
Prior to copernicus, what model was wildly accepted? Heliocentric or geocentric
Liula [17]
Geocentric.

Heliocentric is the idea that the universe revolved around the sun, while Geocentric was that it revolved around the Earth.

Before Copernicus, it was widely believed that the geocentric model was correct, thus making it widely accepted.

Hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
What does this story tell you about the importance of checking a job applicant's background?
sleet_krkn [62]
There's no story here so i'm just gonna slide in here for some points ^-^
7 0
3 years ago
The purchasing power of the dollar a. is inversely related to the level of aggregate demand. b. has been increasing in recent ye
Verizon [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is: d. is the reciprocal of the price level.

Explanation:

In economics, the term "purchasing power" refers to the amount of goods and services that a currency can buy. It is directly related to the price level as follows: when price decreases, people are able to purchase more goods and thus we say that purchasing power increased; on the other hand, when prices increase, people are able to buy fewer goods with the same amount of money, and thus we say that purchasing power decreased.  

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Tom and his mother constantly argue about tom's refusal to wear a clean shirt every day. they are
    12·1 answer
  • Labor unions were formed when individual workers found no success in dealing with their employers. True or false?
    12·1 answer
  • Inspiration occurs when the ________ is less than the ________.
    11·2 answers
  • What was the first sea route from Europe to Asia ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which branches are involved in presidential impeachment?
    7·1 answer
  • Who advocated limited voting rights for blacks be granted at the state constitutional conventions for the former states of the C
    5·1 answer
  • How does a primary source help a historian understand the past
    6·1 answer
  • Give TWO examples of something you think might be unconstitutional.
    11·1 answer
  • Mga sumusunod na gawain
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the French and Glorious Revolution justified?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!