<span>From the monopolist points of view the benefits are, holding 100% of the market, the ability to have a great influence on price and of course, no competition.
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
</span>
NASTY AND ALSO THE GUY THE ANSWERED IS NOW BANNED HAHAHA
In order for Ben to maintain his fluid balance, he should take huge amounts of liquid, and the best liquid that he should take is water. He should take and drink water when jogging, in order to keep himself hydrated as he sweats a lot and when he does not consume water with this behavior, he would likely be dehydrated as he loses the balance of maintaining liquid in his body.
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
Answer:
Cash borrow = 10500
so correct option is a. $10,500
Explanation:
given data
Ending cash balance = $16,000
Beginning cash balance = $19,500
expected cash receipts = $68,000
Cash disbursements = $82,000
solution
we know that Ending cash balance is express as
Ending cash balance = Beginning cash balance + Cash receipts - Cash disbursements + Cash borrow .............................1
we get here Cash borrow put here value
$16,000 = $19,500 + $68,000 - $82,000 + Cash borrow
solve it we get
Cash borrow = 10500
so correct option is a. $10,500
