Answer:
People behavior with lump sum amount:
The experimental evidence shows that people always expect to be treated fairly. When people are treated unfairly, then they will reject the offer regardless of the value of money. Thus, the statement that "should not generalize the evident resulted from $10 experiment. When the size of money is large then people will react differently from the evidence" is false.
Distribution is treated as a deductable to the shareholders of 1:10 to each dollar amount.
Answer:
<h2>In this case,visit to the Butchart Garden is an excludable and non-rivalrous good and is an example of a Club Good.</h2>
Explanation:
First,since the Burchart Gardens charges an admission fee of $30 for each visitor,anyone who has not paid the fee cannot or will not be able to have access inside the garden.Therefore,it is currently not a free service for all the visitors.In this sense,a visit to the Butchart Garden is excludable.It can be assumed that any visitor who wishes to come inside the garden and have a visit will have to mandatorily pay the admission fee.
Secondly,as Butchart Garden is a public area and anyone who pays the admission fee can officially gain access to the garden,enjoyment of the natural and aesthetic beauty of the garden by any one visitor does not reduce the simultaneous enjoyment of any other visitor who has paid the admission fee and hence,gained access to the garden.In economic language,if we consider the garden visit as a particular commodity,then the consumption of the commodity by any one visitor or consumer does not reduce the simultaneous consumption of any other visitor/s or consumer/s,provided that they have all paid the admission fee to gain access to the commodity or garden in this case.Therefore,visits to the Butchart Garden can be considered as non-rivalrous.
Now,since the visit to the Butchart garden is both excludable and non-rivalrous in nature,it can be considered as an example of a Club Good.
Answer:A
Explanation:This question is self explanatory,Alchian and Demsetz are of the options that firms involves a group of people coming to produce goods which brings about greater output than that of individuals .Their focus was mainly on team production in analysing the theory of firms rather than output per individual
Answer:
The Number of warehouses completed would not be a rational base for allocating overhead costs to the warehouses.
Explanation:
For allocating the overhead cost to the warehouse. Following things need to be considered.
1. Square footage of the warehouses : Based on the square foot of the warehouse, the overhead cost can be easily allocated. As different warehouses have different square foot. So there would be different allocation criteria for each warehouse.
2. Labor Hours : According to the labor hours, the overhead expense can be allocated. In warehouse, the size of labor is matter. As more labors are available, the chances of more allocation expenses would be there and if there is less labors so the allocation expenses would be less.
Depending upon the size of the labors, the allocation of overhead differs.
3. Direct material cost : The warehouse is required when more supplies of material is to be required. So here, direct material plays an very important role while allocating the overhead cost. Depending upon the quantity of material, the overhead expenses differs.
4. Number of warehouses completed : As without knowing the size and capacity of the warehouses, it is difficult to allocate the overhead expense. Moreover, the same cost is been allocated which is not acceptable.
Hence, the Number of warehouses completed would not be a rational base for allocating overhead costs to the warehouses.
