the second one
Step-by-step explanation:
because if you see good the second one have the dimensional in the same way
I think the question has to do with the number of students who are attending the university but is neither an undergraduate nor living off-campus. To help us solve this problem, we use the Venn diagram as shown in the picture. The intersection of the 2 circles would be 3 students. The students in the 'students living off-campus' circle would be 9 - 2 = 6, while the undergraduate students would be 36-3 = 33. The total number of students inside all the circles and outside the circles should sum up to 60 students.
6 + 3 + 33 + x = 60
x = 60 - 6 - 3 - 3
x = 18 students
Therefore, there are 18 students who are neither an undergraduate nor living off-campus
69. Oh yes the memes indeed.
Use the compound interest formula.
A = P*(1 +r/n)^(n*t)
where P is the principal, r is the annual rate, n is the number of compoundings per year, and t is the number of years.
For the first investment, ...
A = 208,000*(1 +.08/4)^(4*5) = 309,077.06
For the second investment, ...
A = 218,000*(1 +.07/2)^(2*4) = 287,064.37
Totaling both investments at maturity, Megan has $596,141.43.
A whole number that would support Cindys claim would be 2 because if u do the ,math it would be 8/24 which would be .333 repeating which is simplify to 1/3 and i do not know a number that would not work.