Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
Justified Alignment
Explanation:
The type of text alignment that is frequently seen in newspaper,magazines,and books(both the left and the right sides of the paragraph are perfectly straight).I'm sorry if it was wrong.
brainliest plz ;-;
Hi there! The answer is B. False
Increasing its sales revenue is NOT the only way a firm can increase its profits.
A firm can also increase its profit by reducing its total costs. When the sales revenue stays the same and the total cost decreases, the revenue will increase (without an increasing sales revenue).
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Probability that Bikul wrecks the car is 0.10
loss of wrecking the car is $100000
Therefore risk of wrecking the car = Probability x loss
risk = 0.10 x 100000 = 10,000
premium can be equated with risk, hence premium = $10000
