Nielsen PRIZM uses Market Segmentation.
Explanation:
Market division is the way toward isolating a market of potential clients into gatherings, or sections, in view of various qualities. The fragments made are made out of buyers who will react also to showcasing procedures and who share qualities, for example, comparable interests, needs, or areas.
Market division makes it simpler for advertisers to customize their promoting efforts.
By organizing their organization's objective market into divided gatherings, as opposed to focusing on every potential client exclusively, advertisers can be increasingly effective with their time, cash, and different assets than if they were focusing on buyers on an individual level.
Gathering comparable shoppers enables advertisers to target explicit spectators in a financially savvy way.
Market division additionally lessens the danger of a fruitless or ineffectual showcasing effort.
At the point when advertisers separate a market dependent on key attributes and customize their procedures dependent on that data, there is an a lot higher possibility of progress than if they somehow managed to make a conventional battle and attempt to actualize it over all sections.
Answer:
audit trails
Explanation:
Reports that trace the entry of and changes to critical data values are called <u>audit trails</u> and are essential in every system.
the answer is b message me if it is wrong
A- The net earnings of the individual in question will be $710000 after the individual's claim for loss by fire is settled by the insurance company. B- Yes, he would buy the insurance if he were risk neutral.
C- Yes, the individual will buy the insurance policy if he were a expected utility maximizer as he would want to claim complete settlement of this amount to be claimed in case of fire loss.
- The expected net earnings from the insurance after deducting the amount from the premium paid and total claim endorsed by the insurance company will be $710000 which can be shown as below


We get,

- If the individual were risk neutral he would like to take the insurance as the risk of fire in the example given above is 0.5 which is greater than zero and this ultimately implies that <u>risk cannot be taken.</u>
- In the case if the individual is expected utility maximizer he would take the insurance as it would not only give him the claims from losses due to fire but also help him secure his house against beta of fire.
Hence, the correct answers will be A- $710000; B- Yes.; C- Yes. and imply that taking insurance will be a wise decision by the individual.
To know more about insurance policy , click the link below.
brainly.com/question/24984403