Answer:
Steve
Explanation:
because he can get in contact with Steve while in the hotel
Answer:
The correct answer is c. is based on simplifying assumptions, but is still useful for illustrating scarcity, opportunity cost, and economic growth.
Explanation:
The production possibilities frontier (FPP) is a graphic representation of the maximum quantities of production that an economy can obtain in a given period using all the resources it has available.
In an economy that has thousands of products, the alternatives to produce one good or another and how much of each are very large. When an alternative is chosen, it means that other possibilities are being renounced. The relationship between what we choose and what we give up is the opportunity cost.
Answer:
The number of ounces started and completed during the period is <u>42,000 ounces</u>.
Explanation:
The number of ounces started and completed during the period can be computed by simply deducting the beginning work in process from the number of ounces completed.
Since we have the following from the question:
Number of ounces completed by Filling = 46,000 ounces
Beginning work in process = 4,000 ounces
Therefore, we have:
Number of ounces started and completed = Number of ounces completed by Filling - Beginning work in process = 46,000 ounces - 4,000 ounces = 42,000 ounces
Therefore, the number of ounces started and completed during the period is <u>42,000 ounces</u>.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
First, we need to get the predetermined rate
Predetermined rate = Cost of manufacturing overhead / Cost driver
= $1,800,000/60,000
= $30
We will now calculate the application.
Actual labor hours × rate
= 61,500 × $30
= $1,845,000
We will now compare actual with overhead cost
= Applied Overhead cost - Actual manufacturing overhead
= $1,845,000 - $1,810,000
= $35,000
The above is an over application of overhead cost because the cost applied exceed the actual cost.
<span>The most recent study was done on June 1, 2017, and all information is from that date. There are 673 US District court judgeships and four territorial ones. At the time of this study, there were 160 active circuit court judges and 19 vacant positions, while there were 570 district court judges and a whopping 103 vacant positions.
There are 59 female circuit court judges, 37%. Men, therefore, are in 63% of positions. Intesretingly, this number has actually improved, with only one woman serving in 1977.
Disregarding race, 75% of circuit court judges are white, 13% African American, 9% Hispanic, and only 3% Asian American. 12 courts have African American judges, nine have Hispanic, and five have Asian American. Overall, all three percentages have risen since 1977 (with some variability), but interestingly, Asian Americans have only recently begun to rise in presence., starting in about 2010.
Combining gender and race, white men make up 45.6% of all circuit court judges, while Asian American women only make up 0.6%. In all races, men overpower women in numbers by a large amount.
Looking at age, the average is 64.7 years old, with over 50% over 65 and only 2% under 45. The vast majority were appointed between 45 and 54, though many came slightly before or after.
It is worth noting that the first openly gay circuit court judge was Todd M. Hughes, appointed by Obama in 2013.
If we are considering race, Asian Americans are the lowest represented. If we are considering gender, women are less represented. Overall in race and gender, Asian American women are least represented. Looking at age, people under 40 are underrepresented. Overall, though, the least common demographic would be open members of the LGBT+ community.
As you can see, this is not a straightforward question! It is a hugely interesting topic and one I plan to explore further.</span>
