The hunter gatherers today are different from the ones in the Paleolithic age due to the fact that we are much more advanced technology wise. Even if we’re talking about the amazon tribes they’ve had hundreds of years to advance the way they make their weapons. But they are also similar when it comes to the gathering aspect (I don’t know this 100% so may want to fact check it)
As we know....the Roman Empire was very, very successful.....but if we look closely; I believe it's quite easy to distinguish by which means the Roman Empire used to grow. Rome just loved to war aka conquest other countries...it would use its resources and force them to pay tributaries (payment to the person whom conquered them). They had an incredibly good army..their military techniques were incredibly smart..and they also had war machines; which greatly contributed to their power on the battlefield. As far as I know, Rome rarely made alliances and agreements...Christianity was after the fall of Rome.
This being said to expand and grow, it's quite obvious that the Roman Empire went on conquests and war to expand and thrive. Alas, all Empires fall...as did the might Roman Empire.
Thus, your answer.
I believe that would be Genghis Khan
The Franciscan monks are beggars are following the role of Jesus Christ and his examples by giving up all their possessions and live off the kindness of other people. They did good deeds and minister to the people in exchange for food and clothing, They did not accept money only this is why they were called beggars
