Answer:
that is very hard XD
Step-by-step explanation:
yes the answer wiil be 6{22238= Xyw
No, not reasonable.
98.3 divides by 52.6
Brady used compatible numbers 100 divided by 5 =20
He should've used 100 divided by 50 = 2
1 and 7 are the answer to this
Answer:
The statement that is true is;
The vertices of the image are closer to the origin than those of the pre-image
Step-by-step explanation:
The dilation rule is 0.75(x,y)= (0.75x, 0.75y)
K (-4,4)----------( 0.75*-4,0.75*4)-------K' (-3,3)
L (2,4)-----------(0.75*2,0.75*4)---------L' (1.5,3)
M (-2,2)----------(0.75*-2,0.75*2)--------M' (-1.5,1.5)
Answer:
$501,049.37
Step-by-step explanation:
For computing the amount after 22 years we need to applied the future value which is shown in the attachment below:
Given that
PMT = $9,000
NPER = 22 years
Annual rate = 0.078
Quarterly= 0.078 ÷ 4 = 0.0195
Effective annual rate = (1.0195^4) - 1 = 0.0803113041
Now applied the formula which is given below
= -FV(RATE;NPER;PMT;PV)
After applying the above formula, the future value is $501,049.37