1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tcecarenko [31]
3 years ago
8

Describe how to estimate the product of 396 and 71. Please :)

Mathematics
1 answer:
balu736 [363]3 years ago
4 0
You can round 396 to 400 and 71 to 70. then you just multiply them and get 28,000. :))
You might be interested in
Values for the labor force participation rate of women​ (LFPR) are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. A researche
Anna [14]

Answer:

(A) For this research we made use of the paired t test.

(B) For the t test, we conclude that in the null Hypothesis H₀, there was no difference between the average labor force participation rate for women between the years of 1968 and​ 1972 as against the alternate Hypothesis Hₐ.

From the output data we have, since the P value is 0.024 and  is lesser than the alpha value of 0.05, we will accept the alternate Hypothesis instead of the null Hypothesis.

Note:Kindly find an attached copy of the complete question below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution

Recall that:

The U.S of Bureau of Labor Statistics have published Values for the labor force participation rate of women​ (LFPR).

We are more interested in if there was a difference between female participation 1968 and​ 1972, a rapid change in women.

so we will check values for 19 randomly selected cities for 1968 and​ 1972,

Now,

(a) Which of this test is most appropriate for this data

The test which will be more suitable for these data will be paired to test t.

Because the data is for labor force participation for two different years, we apply the t test. now that we are making a comparison of two different year times, we will apply the t test in this research.

In this case, the sample size for both the years evaluated should be same, since we need to pair each and all the data.

(b)By using the test you selected, explain your conclusion

Now, to test the data paired t test, we have already the null Hypothesis  H₀: In this case there  is no difference between the average labor force participation rate for women between the years of 1968 and​ 1972 as compared with the alternate Hypothesis Hₐ: there was a significant difference between the average labor force participation rate for women between the years of 1968 and​ 1972.

However, from the output, we have that the P value is 0.024 which is lower than the alpha value of 0.05.

In conclusion, the alternate Hypothesis accepted while the null Hypothesis is rejected.

Note: kindly find an attached copy of the complete question to this solution

below.

4 0
3 years ago
Find the solution to the following equation by transforming it into a perfect square trinomial.
Alja [10]
x^{2} -12x=13\ \ \ \Leftrightarrow\ \ \ x^2-2\cdot x\cdot 6+6^2-6^2=13\\\\ \Leftrightarrow\ \ \ (x-6)^2=13+36\ \ \ \Leftrightarrow\ \ \ (x-6)^2=49\ \ \ \Leftrightarrow\ \ \ (x-6)^2=7^2\\\\x-6=7\ \ \ \ \ \ \ or\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ x-6=-7\\\\x=13\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ x=-1\\\\Ans.\ x\in \{-1,\ 13\}
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In ΔIJK, k = 57 inches, i = 37 inches and ∠J=141°. Find ∠I, to the nearest degree.
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

<I= 15degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the cosine rule formulae;

j² = i²+k²-2i cos <J

j² = 37²+57² - 2(37)(57)cos <141

j² = 1369+ 3249- 4218cos <141

j² = 4618- 4218cos <141

j² = 4618-(-3,278)

j²= 7,896

j = √7,896

j = 88.86inches

Next is to get <I

i² = j²+k²-2jk cos <I

37² = 88.86²+57² - 2(88.86)(57)cos <I

1369 = 7,896.0996+ 3249- 10,130.04cos <I

1369 = 11,145.0996 - 10,130.04cos <I

1369 - 11,145.0996 = - 10,130.04cos <I

-9,776.0996=- 10,130.04cos <I

cos <I =9,776.0996 /10,130.04

cos<I = 0.96506

<I = 15.19

<I= 15degrees

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP! I'LL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!
daser333 [38]

Answer:

1.6x10^-18 gram

Step-by-step explanation:

(5.3 x 10⁻²³ gram/molecule) x (20,000 molecule)

= (5.3 x 10⁻²³ x 2 x 10⁴) gram

= (10.6 x 10⁻²³⁺⁴) gram

= (1.06 x 10⁻²³⁺⁵) gram

= 1.06 x 10⁻¹⁸ gram

We need to find the mass of 20,000 molecules of oxygen. It can be calculated using unitary method. Here, we can multiply 20,000 molecules  by the mass of one oxygen molecule.

7 0
3 years ago
7⋅(−4)⋅(−6) help please
N76 [4]

Answer:168

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write the equation of the quadratic function with roots 6 and 10 and a vertex at (8,2)
    7·1 answer
  • A rectangular box is x feet long and x feet wide. The volume of the box is (4x8 + 3x6) cubic feet. What polynomial represents th
    12·1 answer
  • How do you work out this math problem?? 2+2x-5=5(x+3)
    15·2 answers
  • Suppose the hypotenuse of a right triangle is 24 cm and one of the legs is 11 cm. Use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the measur
    12·1 answer
  • The area of the small shape is 35 square feet. The big shape is larger by a scale factor of 4/3. Find the area of the large shap
    7·1 answer
  • Rachna has nickels, dimes, and quarters in her piggy bank. She has $4.65 altogether. She has three more quarters than dimes and
    8·1 answer
  • Take the numbers to their prime factorization. Write the final answer in exponential form. (SHOW YOUR WORK FOR BRAINLIST)
    10·1 answer
  • SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • Good evening Kia koi girl mare sister'bana gi plz​
    11·2 answers
  • A rectangle has an area of 45x2 − 42x − 48 and a width of 5x − 8. what is the length of the rectangle? to find the length of the
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!