Answer:
(c) $5
Explanation:
Remember, To calculate marginal cost, we divide the change in production costs by the change in quantity.
In this example, the change in production cost is $200 (for hiring an additional worker) while the change in quantity of taco is 40 (increase in marginal productivity).
The marginal cost= $200/40
we get $5 as the marginal cost.
Answer:
Option A. The U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
The reason is that the US constitution provides the basic framework for the laws to be formulated and passed both in the US National Assembly and the Senate. The laws cannot be formulated if the US constitution doesn't allows the passing of the law which means that the constitution must be amended first. When the slavery was to be eliminated in 1865, the first problem was that passing the elimination of slavery law was inconflict with the US constitution. So the constitution was amended before passing the law to eliminate the conflict.
In the nutshell, every law originates because of different reasons like Technological reasons, Social reasons, Cultural reason, etc) but the basis remains the same which is US constitution which is the basic framework for passing the law.
Answer: 10% or $2,000,000
Explanation:
Seeing as no figures were produced, we will have to do this ourselves.
We will make assumptions which include the following,
Life of the equipment = 10 Years
Salvage value = 0
Those are our 2 assumptions.
In that case then,
The Annual Depreciation will be,
Depreciation = (Cost of equipment - Estimated salvage value) / Estimated useful life
= (20 - 0) / 10
= $2 million
Seeing as 2 million is,
= 2/20 * 100
= 10%
That would mean that annual depreciation costs at that facility will rise by $2 million or 10%.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
Answer:
Some examples of capital used to produce goods are machinery, human workers, equipment, basically anything that is used by a factory in the production process. You didnt list any options so I can't tell you which one isn't, but I hope this helps!
Explanation:
<u>Available Options Are:</u>
A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
B. Change the role hierarchy and put all of the sales managers in the US and Canada in the same role.
C. Create criteria-based sharing rules to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
D. Create a public group and include all accounts of the same segment and grant access through a permission set.
Answer:
Option A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles
Explanation:
This owner based sharing will allow the sales manager to access information but he will not be able to alter information which gives a right to access information only. This sharing of information will resolve the sales manager concern and will also him and other sales manager to use this information to make informed decisions. Hence Option A is correct.
Putting in the same role would manipulate the data because the data entered by each sales manager will not be distinguished easily and thus the system will not produce meaningful results. Hence Option B is also incorrect.
Option C is also incorrect because allowing access on meeting certain criteria would result in restriction of data. Thus it is not the solution.
Option D allowing access to all the data would not be necessary as some of the data might require protection and also that it might be meaningless to have private accounts. Thus the option D is incorrect.
