<u>Pros:</u>
1.You can now enjoy the ride
2.You can also help your friends to reach a particular destination.
3.You can help your elders as well.
4. You can learn how to drive if earlier you were not having any bike
5. You can learn the ability to drive
<u>Cons:</u>
1.You can be in debt trap.
2. The owner of the bike may ask you again and again for the bike.
3. If in case bike gets damaged then the owner may harass you.
4.Accident may happen if earlier you were unaware about the skill to drive.
Answer:
i think princeton but im not sure
Explanation:
Answer:
topical
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of organizational methods, I can say that based on the information provided within the question these main points are arranged in topical order. This is an arrangement method that focuses on arranging based on a specific subject. In this situation the subjects are the types of learning methods such as Auditory, Visual and Kinesthetic.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Seeing Tony's notebook triggered Jose to retrieve from his working memory the fact that he needed his notebook.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Working memory is a container with certain capacity and have characteristics of carrying temporary information which is used for processing. The regulation of decision making, behaviour and reasoning is possible with working memory.
The capacity also mark and grade-up personal talent for having nice regulation of individual’s mind. So, as soon as Jose saw Tony’s notebook his mind immediately hit and questioned regarding his own homework notebook and answered that it is at home.
Because "<span>Internal validity is the highest priority for theory-testing".</span>
Ecological
validity<span> alludes
to the degree to which the discoveries of an examination can be summed up to
genuine real life settings. While internal validity is a logical idea
that tends to the connection between two factors. It alludes to the degree that
an investigation can rule out or make improbable exchange clarifications of the
outcomes.</span>