The correct answer is D. decreases . . . improves. McGeoch & McDonald (1931) tested their hypothesis that words with the same meaning would be more prone to interference than the unrelated information. In the experiment participants were given a list of words that they practised until they fully memorized it. They were then given another list to remember. The second lists varied, so the second list was totally unrelated. Others were given a second list that contained synonyms of the first. When asked to recall the first list, those who had learned synonyms in the second list had a weaker result and learning unrelated information in the second list produced less impairment. The conclusion was that the interference was most likely to occur with the similar material.
Both have women rights within the government
i’m sorry if i’m wrong my apologies:)
Answer:
You should recommend the applicant, but qualify your recommendation by pointing out that you think he may have exaggerated some details on his resume
Explanation:
Engineers are ethically obligated to prevent the misrepresentation of their associate's qualifications. You must make your employer aware of the incorrect facts on the resume. On the other hand, if you really believe that the applicant would make a good employee, you should make that recommendation as well. Unless you are making the hiring decision, ethics requires only that you be truthful. If you believe the applicant has merit, you should state so. It is the company's decision to remove or not remove the applicant from consideration because of this transgression.
Answer:
A It is an obligation of noncitizens and citizens alike.
Explanation:
