Answer:
The wave of bank failures in the 1920s threatened to undermine political support for banks. Eight states located in the east and south allowed the opening of branches without restrictions. Another 13 states allowed the opening of branches with strong restrictions to protect competition from bankers in rural areas.
Explanation:
The Grass-Steagall Act of 1933 was used to support unit banks and preserve their income by isolating them from competition. This law was designed to hinder the chains and groups of unit banks to organize themselves in a farm. This law discouraged bank consolidation by limiting operations when subscribing securities by banks. The ban on paying interest on demand deposits affected banks even more.
The reforms of the 1930s not only managed to limit mortgage loans, but also established certain specific restrictions to attract agricultural interests affected government subsidies.
A major blow to these laws that prohibited the opening of interstate branches came in 1982, when the Bank Holdings Act of 1956 was amended by Congress to allow bankrupt banks to get acquired by any bank holding .
The final blow to the unit banks came in 1994, when Congress reached the Riegle-Neal Law on interstate banking and branch efficiency. With this law, banks have branches both inside and outside the borders.
Answer: Poison, sperm, lead, microbes from bodies of water, and drugs. Thats all i can think of but im sure there is alot more
Answer:
4th amendment
Explanation:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The most sweeping federal law that restricts the employment and abuse of child workers is the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Child labor provisions under FLSA are designed to protect the educational opportunities of youth and prohibit their employment in jobs that are detrimental to their health and safety. I hope this information helps your question.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Ratio Decidendi; Obiter Dicta
Explanation:
<em>Ratio Decidendi</em> and <em>Obiter Dicta</em> are Judicial Precedents in law. Judicial Precedents are used by Judges in the Court of law to decide on a current case. Judges apply previously decided cases to a current case.
<em>Ratio Decidendi </em>means the reason for the decision. This pronouncement is binding which must be strictly followed. As the Judge delivers judgment he lay out the facts of the case and outlines the evidence brought before the court. The judge equally examines the argument of Counsel on both sides and apply previously decided cases to arrive at a conclusion.
<em>Obiter Dicta </em>means a statement by the way. In the course of delivering Judgment, the judge might make few remarks that are necessarily not related to law or the facts in an issue that should not be relied on. <em>Obiter Dicta</em> has a persuasive effect.
