“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
The answer is b) Estate stratification.
This stratification system was a long-run result of feudalism since it fell under the same principles:
1) There's a social hierarchy in which there were a noble class and a peasant class.
2) Only the noble class could have land ownership, and the peasant (or serf) class must work it for the noble's usufruct.
This system of stratification was upheld not only by illustrated monarchies but also by modern nation-estates (like the U.S.), this is how it received the name of estate stratification.
Here are a couple of features of a flat worm:
. They have soft bodies
. Its scientific name is Platyhelminthes
. There about 20,000 spices of a flat worm
. Flat forms can cause death
. They have ribbon like bodies
. They have know circulatory organs
. They have no respitory organs
.have membranes that enables them to absorb nutriments and oxygen by diffusion
That statement is FALSE.
Significant others are the people to whom you dedicate the majority of your social life the most.
Which means that the actions/personalities of your significant others would Greatly affect many aspects of our socialization.
