Answer:
o inferior
Explanation:
The inferior goods shown the inverse relationship between the demand and the income. If the demand of the goods is increased so the income would fall and if the demand of the goods fall so the income would rises
So this represent that the good is an inferior good
Hence, the second option is correct
The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
Answer:
a. The quality of rental housing units falls
c. The quantity of available rental housing units falls.
Explanation:
As the landlord cannot receive a desired return for their investment they will stop improving and doing proper maintenance of the property to obtain it.
They will also be less likely to rent and would prefer to sale and move away from the real-state investment business in the region to more profitable region or better business. This will make the ernt go up as there is less offer as well so the policy backfires.
Stoping the market to work property will cause market failures and the outcome won't be the desired
Answer:
24.8 per hour
Explanation:
There are 3 workers and hence are three workstations. Consecutive activities are assigned to each workstation such that workload is as uniform as possible
Hence the time in each workstation (WS) is,
WS1 = 45+55+15 = 115 seconds
WS2 = 25+50+5+30 = 110 seconds
WS3 = 95+50 = 145 seconds
Workstation 3 has the highest processing time and hence is the bottleneck and determines the capacity of the process
Therefore capacity = 1/145 per second = 3600/145 per hour = 24.8 per hour
