Answer:
reduce output
Explanation:
The marginal cost ($26) is greater than the marginal revenue ($25). In order to maximise profit, marginal cost should he reduced up to the point where marginal cost equals marginal benefit.
A firm should shutdown, reduce production to zero if average variable cost is greater than price but in this question, the firm shouldn't shut down since price ($25) is greater than average variable cost ($24).
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is the last option: Involving a third party.
Explanation:
To begin with, the major difference between the terms of negotiation and mediation is that in the last one there is a third party involved that seeks for the most quickly and benefitial deal for the both parties that are discussing, while in the negotiation there is not a third party and the two parties existing seeks for their own benefits, even if that means to harm the other person in the process of getting the best for one of them. That is why that the mediation needs to use a third party that has to be impartial to the situation and only wants the best for the parties in the conflict.
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
Answer:
Yes, it was a marketing exchange
The payment made of the tuition was exchanged for the knowledge that led Marissa to the new paid and satisfactory job.
Explanation:
Given that changing means taking one thing for another, in the context of marketing, we understand by exchange relationship an act of communication where the parts involved (two or more) make the offer and reciprocally deliver something of value ( comparison with other objects) and useful (measure of the satisfaction obtained when receiving something of value) that passes to the other part.
