Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
Answer:
1991
Step-by-step explanation:
I divided 44 by 8 to how many times 362 cars would be made. I got 5.5 and then multiplied that by 362 to see that 1991 cars will be produced.
Please find attached photograph for your answer. Please do mark me Brainliest
Answer:
C. Every year the number of subscribers is estimated to increase by 8% over the
number of subscribers the year before.
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the formula :
S = 20,000 (1 + 0.08)^y to estimate ;
S = number of subscribers ; y = years
The expression : (1 + 0.08)^y
0.08 = 0.08 * 100% = 8%
(1 + 0.08)^y represents a continous growth or increase in the number of subcsribers by 8% over the number of subscribers the preceeding year
Answer:
D. <b ≅ <g
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that lines p and q are parallel to each other, therefore the following can be concluded:
✔️<f ≅ <h, this is because they are both Vertical angles.
✔️<d and <h are supplematry, this is because they are same side consecutive interior angles. Consecutive angles are supplematry.
✔️<a and <b are supplematry, this is because they are linear pair angles.
✔️<b cannot be congruent to <g. They are not corresponding angles, nor are they alternate interior angles.