1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pogonyaev
3 years ago
6

ROBERTA transfers property with a tax basis of $400 and a fair market value of $500 to a corporation in exchange for stock with

a fair market value of $350 in a transaction that qualifies for deferral under section 351. The corporation assumed a liability of $150 on the property transferred. What is the amount realized by Roberta in the exchange? A. $500 B. $400 C. $350 D. $250
Business
1 answer:
Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

correct option is A. $500

Explanation:

given data

tax basis = $400

fair market value = $500

fair market value = $350

liability = $150

solution

we get here  amount realized by Roberta in the exchange that is express as

= fair market value of the stock receive +  from the liability  ...................1

amount realized = $350 + $150

amount realized = $500

so correct option is A. $500

You might be interested in
"Clauss Company transfers out 14,000 units and has 2,000 units of ending work in process that are 25% complete. Materials are en
diamong [38]

Answer:

a. $112,000

b.    $7,500

Explanation:

(a) transferred out

Units transferred out are 100% complete for both materials and conversion costs, thus multiply the Total Cost per Equivalent units with the number of units transferred.

Cost of units transferred out = $8 × 14,000 units

                                               = $112,000

(b) in ending work in process

Units of ending work in process are 100% complete in terms of materials ( since materials are entered at the beginning of the process) whilst 25% complete in terms on conversion cost (applied uniformly during production).

Cost of ending work in process

Materials ($3 × 2,000 units)                  = $6,000

Conversion ($3 × (2,000 units × 25%)) =  $1,500

Total Cost                                               = $7,500

6 0
3 years ago
Acquiring Company is considering the acquisition of Target Company in a stock for stock transaction in which Target Company woul
ad-work [718]

Answer:

1) 0.8333

2) 16,666

3) 2.33

4) 56.40

5) 2.2

Explanation:

Share Exchange Ratio = Price per share for Target Company / Market price per share for Acquiring Company  = $50 / $60  =  0.8333

New shares issued by Acquiring Company = Shares of Target Company x Exchange ratio (20,000 x 0.8333) = 16,666

Total shares outstanding of the combined companies = 60,000 + 16,666  = 76,666

Post-merger EPS of the combined companies = ($150,000 + $30,000)/ 76,666 = $2.35

Pre-merger EPS of Acquiring Company = $150,000 / 60,000 = $2.50

Post-merger share price = $2.35 x 24 (pre-merger P/E = $60.00/$2.50) = $56.40

Purchase price = 50 * 20,000 = 1,000,000

Interest expense = 1,000,000 * 8% = 80,000

Post-merger earnings = 150,000 + 30,000 – 80,000 * (1-0.4) = 132,000

Therefore, Post-merger EPS of the combined companies = 132,000/60,000 = 2.2

6 0
3 years ago
Gains from remeasuring a foreign subsidiary’s financial statements from the local currency, which is not the functional currency
Archy [21]

Answer:

Gains from remeasuring a foreign subsidiary’s financial statements from the local currency, which is not the functional currency, into the parent company’s currency should be reported as a(n):_______

d. Part of continuing operations.

Explanation:

Gains from the remeasurement of a subsidiary's financial statements from the local currency to the parent company's currency should be reported as part of the continuing operations.  It forms part of the current income.  They are not deferred.  It is translation adjustments that are reported as other comprehensive income, not gains from remeasurement. Remeasurement gains from a subsidiary's local currency to the parent's are also not extraordinary items.

4 0
3 years ago
You are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $1,006,000, have a four-year life, and have no salvage value; de
Serjik [45]

Answer:

A) In Best Case: revenues rise by 10% while costs decline by 10%. In the worst case, profits are declining by 10%, while costs are rising by 10%.

Scenario   Unit sales         Variable costs Fixed costs

  Base      360                   $16,300          $334,000

  Best        396                    $14,670           $300,600

  Worst      324                    $17,930           $367,400

b), c) Using the tax shield approach, the OCF and NPV for the base case estimate is:

OCF(base) = [($19,800 – 16,300)(360) – 334,000](0.60) + 0.40(1,006,000/4)

OCF(base)= $656,200

NPV(base) = –$1,006,000 + $656,200(PVIFA14%,4)

NPV(base) = $905,978.01

OCF(worst) = [($19,800 – 17,930)(324) – 367,400](0.60) + 0.40(1,006,000/4)

OCF(worst)= $243,688

NPV(worst) = –$1,006,000 + $243,688(PVIFA14%,4)

NPV(worst) = $ (295,963.28)

OCF(best) = [($19,800 – 14,670)(396) – 300,600](0.60) + 0.40(1,006,000/4)

OCF(best)= $1,139,128

NPV(best) = –$1,006,000 + $1,139,128(PVIFA14%,4)

NPV(best) = $2,313,091.27

d) OCF and NPV with Fixed Costs 344,000

OCF(base) = [($19,800 – 16,300)(360) – 344,000](0.60) + 0.40(1,006,000/4)

OCF(base)= $650,200

NPV(base) = –$1,006,000 + $650,200(PVIFA14%,4)

NPV(base) = $888,295.74

e) (Change in NPV in Case d wrt Case c)/Change in FC,

(888,295.74 - 905,978.01)/(10,000) = -1.75

8 0
3 years ago
Nire   has a comparative advantage in producing butter, whereas Nire   has a comparative advantage in producing guns.Consider a
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

A proposed trade of 12.5 pounds of butter for 20 guns may NOT be mutually agreeable to both countries.

The main idea of comparative advantage is NOT trade by barter but buying and selling. Comparative advantage is a principle that states that a country should produce more of the goods and services which it can produce at a lower opportunity cost than that of trade partners and thereafter sell to those partners at a lower cost than they would have produced it themselves in the bid to be self reliant.

It is difficult to agree to such a deal of 12.5 pounds of butter for 20 guns because it is impossible to conclude that they are even or equal in value. The both countries should sell to each other as money is a common means of exchange.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • After earning $50 million in net income, Marshall Manufacturing distributed $15 million in dividends to their stockholders. Mars
    12·1 answer
  • Lily wants to build a business. She has very little capital. She does, however, have a partner with which she could run a busine
    15·1 answer
  • Sari, a movie theater manager, recently implemented a policy stating that workers who are willing to work a double shift on Frid
    15·2 answers
  • 02 quiz consider the dominos pizza turnaround case study you read in this lesson. based on its actions, which of these things wo
    7·1 answer
  • Among the 1018 ​respondents, 128 said that rising gas prices are "not at all annoying." what percentage of respondents said that
    12·1 answer
  • Two products, QI and VH, emerge from a joint process. Product QI has been allocated $28,300 of the total joint costs of $49,000.
    9·1 answer
  • The demand for subassembly S is 100 units in week 7. Each unit of S requires 1 unit of T and 2 units of U. Each unit of T requir
    9·1 answer
  • Okay this is starting to get annoying. I ask an actual question and I just have bots reply with a link to a virus download and t
    15·2 answers
  • A common-size income statement is an accounting statement that expresses all of a firm's expenses as a percentage of:_______
    11·1 answer
  • Deforestation can significantly reduce the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. see section 12.16 (page) . true false
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!