Answer:
A. Ill-conceived goals
Explanation:
Ill-conceived goals refers to setting of goals or incentives in order to promote a desired behavior whereas indirectly encouraging a negative one.
When setting ill-conceived goals, the unintended effects of these goals should duly be taken into consideration.
Answer:
Normally "check all that apply" is followed by answers to check...
Explanation:
A W-2 is a Tax statement
Answer: One-third
Explanation:
The impact of technology in our everyday life cannot be understated. Technology has made life easier by simplifying our work lives and personal lives. In the restaurant industry, technological terms such as artificial intelligence, mobile apps, smart devices etc are now common in the industry.
Technology helps in making work easier. This can be noticeable in knowing the food cost percentage of a restaurant. Through technology, the food cost percentage of a restaurant can now be known in one third of the time used before technology came into place.
The expected value for the number of cars with defects can
be obtained by multiplying the probability of success (i.e. the percentage of
products with defects - 40%) by the number of cases (i.e. the number of cars
purchased – 5).
40 / 100 X 5 = 2
Therefore, the expected value for the number of cars with
defects will be the percentage of products with defects is 2
Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.