Answer:
cleaning up trash off the side of the road...
Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
Answer:
Dr Land $146,440
Cr Common stock (3,380 shares×$12 par value) $40,560
Cr Paid in Capital in excess of Par common stock $105,880
Explanation:
Arasota Company Journal entry
Dr Land $146,440
Cr Common stock (3,380 shares×$12 par value) $40,560
Cr Paid in Capital in excess of Par common stock $105,880
It should be noted that corporate officers have the implied power to bind the firm in matters directly connected to its business.
<h3>Who are corporate officers?</h3>
corporate officers serves as those workers in a company or an organization who are seen as officials and they have allocated duties and responsibilities .
These officers posses the power to bind the firm in matters directly connected to its business.
Learn more about corporate officers at,;
brainly.com/question/24518056
