4) would be your correct answer
Answer:
There was an improvement in accuracy. There was no change in precision.
Explanation:
<em>The average mass after recalibration is closer to the mass of the standard, </em>so the recalibration improved the accuracy<em> </em>(the measurement is closer to an accepted 'true' value).
The standard deviation did not change, so the precision (or how disperse the measurements are) was not affected.
Answer:
Explanation:
Partial pressure of oil = mole fraction of oil x total pressure
mole fraction of oil = mole of oil / mole of water + mole of oil
= mole of oil = mass of oil / molecular weight of oil
= 20 / 100 = .2
mole of water = 80 / 18
= 4.444
mole fraction of oil = .2 / .2 + 4.444
= .2 / 4.644
Partial pressure of oil = mole fraction of oil x total pressure
= (.2 / 4.644 ) x 760 mm
= 32.73 mm Hg .
The three of them have the same amount of electrons, so we can’t determine the right one on that ground. As you might know, Pauli said that electrons are always in the position of the lowest energy. So the first situation is impossible because there is a free place available that takes less energy. Then the 3rd situation is nor possible because if one electron has a different spin than the others, there is a magnetic obstruction that be prevented if the spin changes. This means that the second situation is the right one.
