Answer: Central-route Persuasion
Explanation:
Central-route for persuasion is defined as convincing technique based on message content.A person is persuaded through this technique by giving him knowledge regarding the main factors, features, characteristics present in the message.
According to the situation of question, salesperson is convincing Darcy through central route.He is providing the main and major content /information about the car such as benefits, disadvantage, features and related explanation.
Answer:
I believe the answer is Maine but im not 100%
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the reading. There is no reading here, no text, excerpt, or a link to it.
However, although you forgot to attach the reading, we can help you commenting an idea based on our knowledge of the topic.
It is correct to say that it is relatively easy that entrepreneurs can enter and leave markets in a free enterprise system of the United States. Indeed it is one of its advantages.
However, the same affirmation cannot be applied to a country with a command economy because in a command economy the conditions are in total opposition to a free-market economy where individuals promote capitalist ideas to invest money and create companies in order to be rich.
In a command economy, it is the state the one that owns the means of production. The central government decides the kind of products to be produced, the price of the products, how to produce the goods, and the amount that is going to be produced.
The implications that this has for the law of supply in that country is that it cannot be considered because the law of supply/demand is only valid in a free market economy, not in a command economy.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the effects of an assignment, the assignor's rights are extinguished. Hence, It is a correct statement to say that the rights of the assignee are subject to the defenses that the obligor has against the assignor. This is is to say that it is only those rights that the assignor had at the beginning that can be obtained by the assignee.
Answer:Mark may recall it as less serious accident than if the officer has used other wording (e.g., "smashed" each other)
Explanation: The use of the word "hit each other " makes it sound as if this might have not been a more serious accident than you might remember it but the use of the word smashed may create an idea that this was a more serious accident.
