No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
Monotheism permanently replaced polytheism in ancient Egypt.
Explanation:
- Amenhotep IV, better known as Akhenaten, was an Egyptian Pharaoh. He came to power after the death of his father.
- in the 14th century BC, at a time when the Egyptian kingdom was at the height of power and luxury.
- He ruled from 1352-1336. pr. Cr. Because of the many Jews in his court, many of whom were highly placed he introduced a monotheistic religion and carried out a religious reform in which Aten, the sun-god, was the only god.
- The unhappy clergy tried to carry out two unsuccessful assassinations against Pharaoh.
Learn more on Akhenaten on
brainly.com/question/10574164
brainly.com/question/833737
brainly.com/question/9034792
#learnwithBrainly
It wont allow me to view the image, but i will attempt to reload it when i arrive home.
Answer: They achieved arts, math, and writing
Explanation: It only says the "roman achievement" so I came up w/ what they achieved
Hope this is right:D
Calpurnia tries to prevent Caesar from going to the Senate House because she had nightmares of his death (B).
