Answer:
The summary of the given question is summarized throughout the below portion.
Explanation:
- Fixed supply would be described as more of a commodity or items will keep a fixed cost, a growing market will result in an increased balance price of the underlying security throughout the availability.
- The amounts that a supplier is prepared to offer of any sort of commodity or target market at any certain price must be displayed graphically, seen as a fixed supply curve.
A traditional story about travels or adventures can be Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure Island. It speaks of a group of pirates in search of a lost treasure and certainly includes travels and adventures.
Susan B. Anthony, Harriet Tubman, Booker T. Washington, Thomas Edison, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Henry Ford, John Steinbeck, Rosa Parks, Billy Graham, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, Barack Obama, etc.
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.
Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.
Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.
As the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States intensified in the late 1940s and early 1950s, hysteria over the perceived threat posed by Communists in the U.S. became known as the Red Scare.
HOPE THIS HELPED!! XD
