It's true the slaughterhouse cases are an example of the supreme court whittling away at the freedoms gained by the blacks during reconstruction.
Option A) is true.
The Supreme Court decision in the 1873 Slaughterhouse Case was a setback for African Americans. Because the court held that the most basic civil rights of Americans were acquired through state citizenship, and the Amendment did not protect those rights. legislation.
The Slaughterhouse Cases, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1873, limited the "privileges and immunities" of citizens protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to states to those provided for in the Constitution. and many held that they did not involve individuals. State Rights.
Learn more about slaughterhouse case at
brainly.com/question/9354360
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Great Alaska earthquake struck at 5:36 p.m. Alaska Standard Time on March 27, 1964. The shaking lasted for more than four minutes, launching several deadly tsunamis and triggering killer landslides. The earthquake also transformed geology, because it revealed that oceanic plates are shoved under continents.
Explanation:
Maturation is a threat to internal validity stemming from either long-term or short-term physiological changes occurring within the participants that may influence the dependent variable.
<h3>
What are physiological changes?</h3>
Ageing causes physiological changes in all organ systems. Arteriosclerosis develops, blood pressure rises, and cardiac output declines. Lung function is compromised, vital capacity is reduced, and expiratory flow rates are slowed.
Pregnancy causes a number of physiological changes in the mother, such as an increase in fat and total body water, a drop in plasma protein concentrations, particularly albumin, an increase in blood volume, cardiac output, and blood flow to the kidneys, and a decrease in blood pressure.
Learn more about physiological changes here:
brainly.com/question/14970685
#SPJ4
Answer:
Invisible hand , did not edge
Explanation:
just did it they were correct
Answer:
The correct answer is: friend of the court.
Explanation:
The friend of the court is someone who is not a party in one case, but who assists a court by offering information or expertise. Many experts in the humanities or other social sciences use the friend of the court services to represent their clients.
It comes from Roman law, and it was implemented into English law in the 9th century.
