Answer:
The answer is construct validity.
Explanation:
Construct validity is described as the degree in which a study<em> actually</em> measures what it claims to be measuring. A well-designed research will ideally have high construct validy, while a poorly designed one may confound the variables and result in measuring a different aspect.
For example, if a researcher tries to find which of two perfumes is more attractive to customers, <u>but uses different shaped or coloured bottles</u>, it's possible that the test will lack construct validity (the bottles may affect the customers' opinions).
Hieroglyphics is how they communicated but not really. It was used as symbolism i guess you could say. Have you seen those movies where you see all the ancient art on the inside of caves?? That's basically what it was in Egypt except it was used as art
Answer: This is customer to customer online marketing
Explanation:
This is a way that customers create a productive ways to interact with each other in order to trade product that can be sold online with easy access.
This means a customer has a relationship with a particular business where they buy product that they can sell online at advertise online
A third part is used to sell these product or advertise them a third part as in this case is an online platform.
Consumers are able to advocate for the quality of that product .
Answer: The base-rate fallacy
Explanation: The base rate fallacy also refered to as base rate bias is the tendency of an individual to erroneously predict the likely outcome of a situation by over looking all relevant data that was supposed to be taken into account. It is the preference of individuating information over relevant data. Stephon over looked the statistical data that his chance of making it into the NBA is low and prefer to go with the individuating information about how his friend's brother receives a lucrative contract to play for the NBA. This situation best illustrates base-rate fallacy.
Answer:
Cultivation.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, in the cultivation stage of a mentoring relationship, there is continued growth and development for both the mentor and protégé, and there is mutual sharing, trust, and learning as the relationship becomes more rewarding for both parties. This is the primary stage in which the mentee, the protégé, learns from the mentor and both their roles (teacher-student) are at their peak level. Then, the relationships starts to shift into other levels.
