Answer: Acceptance and commitment therapy
Explanation:
Acceptance and commission therapy could be described as a therapy method that uses acceptance and mindful strategies in various ways with commitment and behavior pattern to help the mind of an individual. It's used in cases such as handling stress, anxiety, depression obsessed disorders.
The following are principles of acceptance and commitment therapy;
Expansion and acceptance
Contact and connection with the moment
Cognitive defusion
Observing self
Values clarification
<u>Answer:
</u>
Only mandatory reporters (as defined by local, state or federal laws) need to know the guidelines for reporting child sexual abuse is a FALSE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The knowledge regarding the guidelines specified for the reporting of sexual abuse of children is available for free on resources like the internet and in various books on the topic.
- The knowledge regarding this particular type of reporting is mandatory for the ones working in the discipline. But for those who are not directly associated with the said discipline, the access to the guidelines is still open for all.
- To be extensively vigilant, it is actually advisable for all that each one of us, whether or not associated with the discipline or the matters of child sexual abuse, should be aware of the guidelines for the good of all.
Answer:
There should be peace at all costs - Senseless and needless wars are the way of the past. War should always be the last option, not the first.
Open the doors of cooperation - Major world powers like China and Russia are countries that we can't afford to be messing with, or have a poor relationship with. It's simply unproductive. De-militarize the Russian-NATO border, and seek out positive economic and diplomatic opportunities with both Russia and China. Treat them as partners, not adversaries.
Strengthen our already-held friendships with countries like Israel, Britain, Germany, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia.
These are not my ideas but i do agree with them. Hope i helped! xoxo
The idea that the Earth is alive may be as old as humankind. The ancient Greeks gave her the powerful name Gaia and looked on her as a goddess. Before the nineteenth century even scientists were comfortable with the notion of a living Earth. According to the historian D. B. McIntyre (1963), James Hutton, often known as the father of geology, said in a lecture before the Royal Society of Edinburgh in the 1790s that he thought of the Earth as a superorganism and that its proper study would be by physiology. Hutton went on to make the analogy between the circulation of the blood, discovered by Harvey, and the circulation of the nutrient elements of the Earth and of the way that sunlight distills water from the oceans so that it may later fall as rain and so refresh the earth.
This wholesome view of our planet did not persist into the next century. Science was developing rapidly and soon fragmented into a collection of nearly independent professions. It became the province of the expert, and there was little good to be said about interdisciplinary thinking. Such introspection was inescapable. There was so much information to be gathered and sorted. To understand the world was a task as difficult as that of assembling a planet-size jigsaw puzzle. It was all too easy to lose sight of the picture in the searching and sorting of the pieces.
When we saw a few years ago those first pictures of the Earth from space, we had a glimpse of what it was that we were trying to model. That vision of stunning beauty; that dappled white and blue sphere stirred us all, no matter that by now it is just a visual cliché. The sense of reality comes from matching our personal mental image of the world with that we perceive by our senses. That is why the astronaut's view of the Earth was so disturbing. It showed us just how far from reality we had strayed.
The Earth was also seen from space by the more discerning eye of instruments, and it was this view that confirmed James Hutton's vision of a living planet. When seen in infrared light, the Earth is a strange and wonderful anomaly among the planets of the solar system. Our atmosphere, the air we breathe, was revealed to be outrageously out of equilibrium in a chemical sense. It is like the mixture of gases that enters the intake manifold of an internal combustion engine, i.e., hydrocarbons and oxygen mixed, whereas our dead partners Mars and Venus have atmospheres like gases exhausted by combustion.
The unorthodox composition of the atmosphere radiates so strong a signal in the infrared range that it could be recognized by a spacecraft far outside the solar system. The information it carries is prima facie evidence for the presence of life. But more than this, if the Earth's unstable atmosphere was seen to persist and was not just a chance event, then it meant that the planet was alive—at least to the extent that it shared with other living organisms that wonderful property, homeostasis, the capacity to control its chemical composition and keep cool when the environment outside is changi
