D. NI = AC is the needed information to prove ΔINF = ΔCAT by the ASA Postulate.
For the triangles to be congruent by ASA, the measurements of two angles and one side must be proven congruent. Since two sets of congruent angles are already given, one side must also be congruent.
When proving congruency using ASA, the congruent parts of the triangles must be in this order: Angle, Side, Angle. So, you have to the side that is between the two sets of congruent angles.
I think the correct answer would be B. If the residuals for brand A form an increasing curve, and the residuals for brand B form a U-shaped pattern, then neither of the data is likely to be linear. In order to be linear, the residuals of both data set should be, more or less, linear or approaching linearity in nature. Therefore, the linear regression that was done would not give good results since it is only applicable to linear data sets. Also, you can say that the relation of the data sets of the products are not linear. It would be best to do a curve fitting for both sets by using different functions like parabolic functions.
2450 is the correct answer because if you multiply 3500 x .70 then you get 2450. Hope this helped
