This result stems from both incumbent managers and outside bidders having perfect information. - False
<h3>
In China, in cases where the incumbent manager was the winning bidder, firm productivity tended to increase dramatically. When the outside bidders won, there was little productivity improvement. If incumbent managers were not generally more qualified, how can you explain this result?</h3>
The incumbent managers have the authority of holding office for a specific tenure. When outside bidders make a bid for holding office, then these bidders express their profit margins.
If they would get selected for managerial jobs, then their performances are not up to the mark.
Instead, incumbent managers generally have more experience and all information regarding offices and operations, then these managers have a higher probability of showing good performances.
Hence, these managers can perform very well even after being less qualified.
To learn more about bidding, refer
brainly.com/question/3148645
#SPJ4
Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial powers were separate and kept each other in check to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. He believed that uniting these powers, as in the monarchy of Louis XIV, would lead to despotism.
Answer:
90 minutes
Explanation:
this question has already been answered on Brainly.
Boats were used to transport goods from southern Mesopotamia to the Gulf.
Answer:
Anita could be accused of Questionable research practices, by excluiding studies that did not work.
Explanation:
When conducting an investigation, it is of importance that a researcher writes down both positive and negative aspects of the research. If a hypothesis for instance couldn´t be proof or was mistaken, this is part of the results of the investigation that must be written down.