Answer:
The correct option is<em> "A." which is "believed that the free market assured personal freedom."</em>
The Young Americans for Freedom was based on the<em> Sharon Statement.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
<em>The Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) </em><em>is an ideologically conservative youth activism organization that was founded in 1960 as a coalition between traditional conservatives and libertarians on American college campuses.</em>
<em />
<em>The summary of the Core Principles of the Sharon Statement are:</em>
- <em> Individual freedom and the right of governing originate with God;</em>
- <em> Political freedom is impossible without economic freedom;</em>
- <em> Limited government and strict interpretation of the Constitution;</em>
- <em> The free market system is preferable over all others;</em>
- <em> Communism must be defeated, not contained.</em>
Answer:
Applewood can stop the shipment and have the goods returned (the right of stoppage of goods).
Explanation:
When the buyer becomes insolvent while the goods are in transit, and the goods have not been paid yet, then the seller has the right to stop the delivery and resume possession of the goods.
Applewood could also try to sue Marco for specific performance but considering their current position it might be useless and actually result in more money invested and larger losses.
Answer:
Option 4 Building is the most valuable asset owned by Riya
Explanation:
The reason is that the asset lowers the breakeven point and also helps to increase the profit by offering at lower prices than the competitor to increase the product demand and earn more by increased demand (Demand and price relationship application). So the most valuable asset from the business perspective is building owned by Riya.
Work refers to any useful activity.
Answer: B) Correct Incorrect
Explanation:
Whilst it was generally believed at some point that raising taxes and Government Spending by the same amount would have no effect, research has disproven this thought.
This is because it was shown that an increase in Government Spending leads to a larger increase in GDP than an increase in taxes reduces it.
This is because when the Government spends money, the Multiplier effect of Government Spending is always 1 more than that of the Taxes therefore raising taxes and spending by the same amounts still increases the Real GDP because Government Spending will create more income than taxes will take.
Necco is right, Packard is wrong.