216
Step-by-step explanation:
36*6=216
use a calculation
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given function is 
.
When this function is translated to the right 7 units and down 9 units, then the equation becomes
.
Always remember that; 
is a transformation that translates the graph of c units to the right and k units down.
The correct choice is the first option.
Answer:
1100
2200
Step-by-step explanation:
Since speed is constant, the distance is proportional to the time. We notice that the number in the second column is 1650/3 = 550 times the number in the first column, so the two missing numbers are ...
2 × 550 = 1100
4 × 550 = 2200
