Him and his friend were sent home for organizing student-lead protests and manifestations. This foreshadowed his devotion to activism and wanting to do what he could to make a change that was important to him.
Answer:
Hair
Explanation:
The scientist predict that the contamination occurred several months ago. Under normal circumstances, most organisms would no longer have a trace of exposure in their urine or blood after 3 months. If the organisms exposed to the radioactive three months ago and do not come near that area again within 3 months, the scientist wouldn't be able to identify it.
But, if that substance got into their hair, it will last way longer than that. Hair Analysis is very common to be used among forensic toxicologist to identify contamination that occurred months because of this.
This would what is called convergent thinking as this type
of thinking is more suitable for more routine problems than the ones that require
a person to come up with a more creative solution. Convergent thinking sees
that there is only one solution to the problem and you will see that all lines
of thinking guided by the previous knowledge and logic converge to a singe
point and show the solution.
Hello. You forgot to put the reference of the quote. The reference is:
--from page 12 of a 2002 New York Times article, "Every Man a Kingpin," by Tom Zeller
Answer:
The letters B and C are correct.
Explanation:
The letter A does not present the author of the statement, nor does it provide the place where the statement was withdrawn, which means that the letter A is an example of plagiarism.
The letters B and C, however, present the statement as a quote, providing data such as the name of the author of the statement and where readers can find the original text, that is, options B and C, gave due credit to the original material and for that reason, they are the right options.
What even is that is it a show
