The Stamp act, the Quartering act and the Intolerble act. They had to pay tax for something they always bought without tax and the money went to the British and they had to act like a servents for the soldiers that stayed in thier house. Also Samulel Adams made it sound like the British shot the colonist on purpose during the Boston Massacure.
Answer: if there is no context, the event gets isolated. Isolating events is one of the strategies of propaganda, indoctrination and manipulation.
Explanation: context gives us frame of reference, spirit of the time (Zeitgeist) and thus we view things from better perspective. If not, we tend to project our own contemporary perspective on the event.
This is known as Stereotyping. Judging someone on the basis of one's perception of the group to which the person belonges is called Stereotyping.
Many people have a tendency to make judgements on others' character traits based on their ethnic, religious, cultural or another kind of background. This type of judging is frowned upon by modern society.
<h3>What is Stereotyping?</h3>
When we judge someone on the basis of our perception of a group to which he or she belongs we’re using the shortcut called stereotyping.
For instance, “Married persons are more stable employees than single persons” is an example of stereotyping. To the degree that a stereotype is based on fact, it may produce accurate judgments. However, many stereotypes aren’t factual and distort out judgment.
Judging a person on the basis of one’s perception of a group to which he or she belongs.
Therefore, we can conclude that the correct option is B.
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was:
Judging someone on the basis of one's perception of the group to which the person belonges is called
A) confirmation bias
B) stereotyping
C) framing effect
D) self-serving bias
E) bandwagon effect
Learn more about Stereotyping on:
brainly.com/question/21190444
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correlation does not equal causation.
Explanation:
This effect simply means that because two things are happening at the same time, it does not necessarily mean one caused the other, even when they logically look alike.
Example could be seen in a case where it is possible that people who drink more alcohol may possibly also eat more junk food, or smoke. Maybe they don’t sleep as long, or always have the best mental health. Maybe they do! But these studies don’t account for these factors, and this can be a part of why increased alcohol intake is associated with these cancers.